Last week I wrote a post relating the movie Clueless to writing and mentioned how it’s based on Jane Austen’s Emma. Then last night (Sunday) my hubby read that post (he’s an accountant and currently VERY BUSY during the week) and decided he wanted to watch Clueless (which is ironic because of what I said in that post). And as we watched it, here’s what I couldn’t stop noticing:

Call me crazy here, but don’t you think the cast of the 1996 Emma and the 1995 Clueless look just a little too similar in their respective roles?

First you have Gwyneth Paltrow and Alicia Silverstone, both with their iconic silky long blond hair.

Then you have Jeremy Northam and Paul Rudd with that thick dark hair and those narrow, piercing eyes.

Toni Collette and Brittany Murphy both did the curly red-head thing and have similar facial features.

And I swear that even the two Elton characters and Mr Martin and Travis looked similar.

So my question is . . . was it on purpose? Did the 1996 movie capitalize on the popularity of Clueless by casting similar-looking characters that would be easily identified by Clueless fans? Or is it just pure coincidence?

And isn’t it funny how we latch onto a certain view of certain characters?

My neighbor adores the BBC version of Pride and Prejudice and loves to argue with me about how my favorite version, the Focus Features one from 2005, gets Darcy completely wrong because Colin Firth is the true Darcy. Plus, she prefers the more buxomish Lizzy to the skinny, flat-chested Keira Knightley (and maybe I prefer Keira Knightley’s figure because I am skinny and flat-chested, which brings up the question of how much we assume or want our favorite characters to be like ourselves). But beyond that, I just think the entire cast of the Focus Features film better fit the characters as I’d pictured them — beautiful, shy Jane down to silly Lydia; Darcy and Bingley down to Charlotte and Mr. Collins (despite the fact that Collins in the book is described as tall).

And of course, it happens the same way with modern books as it does with classics. There was the outrage over Robert Pattinson as Edward when he was initially cast, because he didn’t mesh with fans’ mental image of the character — until they got used to the idea, and now he is Edward, probably forever, the way Matthew Broderick will always be Ferris Bueller. Some characters overtake the actor, even.

I saw the first three Harry Potter films before I read the books, so those actors were the characters in my head. There was no separating them.

But on the other hand, most of the time I don’t want the faces of characters to be given to me. This past week I spent hours and hours in the 563 pages of Beautiful Creatures, loving the characters so much that they were real to me. I was so glad that the book trailer I’d seen right before I started reading didn’t include any faces so that I was free to picture them for myself:

[UPDATE: However, if you want faces for your characters, you don’t have to look any further than the fansite for a book, such as one I stumbled on just a few hours after publishing this post; a fansite for Beautiful Creatures just put up a cast list complete with a poll for visitors to vote for their favorite Ethan. I’d never heard of any of the actors on the poll, but I voted for Logan Lerman just based on the photos provided — and he’s winning! So this means that I have good taste in character casting, right? Or at least popular taste.]

How do you feel about putting faces to your favorite characters? Have some movie adaptations disappointed you because of the casting? Do you like having a character’s face on the cover of a book or in a book trailer? Which ones have worked for you and which ones haven’t? And is it a face and a physical description that make a character real, or something else? What is it that makes the picture fit the words?

Leave a comment!

10 thoughts on “Casting Characters

  1. It is funny how we get attached to certain images of characters. Colin Firth will forever and always be Mr. Darcy in my eyes.
    And wow, the similarities with the characters in Clueless and Emma are amazing – I wonder how I never noticed!


  2. You know, I loved all the cast from the 2005 P&P except for Keira Knightley. She just didn’t work for me. But speaking of Darcy’s, have you seen Lost in Austen and the commentary in that of Mr. Darcy? For some reason this post made me think of that.

    I don’t like having faces to most of my favorite characters, especially not on covers. My least favorite was the cover of A Stranger to Command by Sherwood Smith ( It was a prequel to Crown Duel, which I loved, and this looks nothing at all like I pictured him. It’s hard with a cover, though, because it’s such a static image. With a movie, I’m a lot more forgiving if they have a close interpretation to how I saw the character. I once saw the musical Beauty and the Beast and was so disappointed when a short, slight figured man came out as Gaston. But he had the attitude and everything down so well that I forgave him for his lack of size and totally bought that he was Gaston.


    1. That’s such a great point. And maybe that’s why Tom Hollander works for me as Mr. Collins despite his height issue, too, because he just does a fantastic job of drawing both annoyance and sympathy from me for that character.

      I think my next post might have to be a cover comparison with book covers that have faces that I think work and ones that I think don’t. I’m curious how many visitors would agree or disagree with my picks!


    1. Mmmm, I totally agree. Makes me want to go watch Emma right now. Although I hear there’s a new version with an even yummier Mr. Knightley. I might have to check that out.


  3. I cannot get over Keira Knightly. She annoys the crap out of me… but I think I need to see that version a second time. I am just extremely obsessed with my 5 hr BBC/A&E version. However, I am not saying that Jane is ugly, but I can see how they did a better job at casting Jane for the new one. I am curious if I will like this movie a second time around…


    1. LOL. Keanu Reeves annoys the crap out of me. Sarah Jessica Parker is the one for Dave. I guess we all have particular actors that don’t work for us. And if you love the 5hr version, that’s cool!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s